Infrora

The infrastructure behind the future.

The procurement record for long-lead electrical equipment. Specification packages and supplier quotes in, an engineer-reviewed comparison out, every number traced to its page.

Request a demo See how it works

From specification to award.

A specification becomes typed requirements. Quotes become a comparison an engineer has signed. Nothing is sent or awarded without a person.

  1. Ingest specs
  2. Review requirements
  3. Compare quotes
  4. Award on record

The decision lives in four places, and none of them is a record.

A sixty-page Spec rev B.pdf, quotes from Supplier A, Supplier B and Supplier C, a retyped bid-tab v7.xlsx and an engineer's memory. Infrora makes them one record: values typed and anchored to their page, exceptions decided by a named engineer, sends and awards signed.

Requirements

Every requirement, traced to its page.

The specification is parsed into typed requirements. Each one shows the exact source text and page, and critical fields wait for an engineer.

  • Evidence anchors
  • Typed units
  • Hard gates
  • Engineer sign-off
Run it on your own spec
Requirements · Package 0042 · spec rev B
…shall withstand 25kA rms symmetrical…
p.14
Short-circuit withstandneeds review
Normalized25 kA · 2 sSource text“…shall withstand 25kA rms symmetrical for two (2) seconds…”Anchorspec rev B · p.14 · lines 212–214CriticalityHard gate
AcceptCorrectMark unknown
Rated voltage15 kVacceptedp.9
Seismic qualificationunknownnot found
Where did 25 kA come from?spec rev B · p.14 · lines 212–214

Fig. 1 Requirements review with the evidence inspector. Synthetic specification, not a customer document.

Review inbox

Quotes arrive. Exceptions find the engineer.

Supplier replies are parsed as they land. Hard gates are checked in code; anything unknown or contradictory is routed, never passed.

  • Email ingest
  • Deterministic checks
  • Stale detection
  • Priority routing
See what you get back
Review inbox · sorted by priority
SSupplier B replied with quote_rev1.pdf2 min ago2 hard gates pass1 critical unknownarc-resistance class · p.4 · routed to engineering
Spec rev C uploaded by J. Alvarez, replaces rev B41 min ago3 items staleaward blockedshort-circuit rating 25 → 31.5 kA · re-evaluate
award blockedSpec rev C replaced rev B. Three requirements are stale until an engineer re-checks them.

Fig. 2 The review inbox after three events. Synthetic.

Evaluation

A comparison you can defend.

Pass, fail or unknown per hard gate, evaluated cost per quote, and no total when a required component is missing. The cheapest price never outranks a failed gate.

  • Landed cost
  • FX pinned to a date
  • Pass / fail / unknown
  • Frozen snapshot
Get this for one package
Evaluation · RFQ 0042 · draft
RequirementSupplier ASupplier BSupplier C
Rated voltagehard gate · 15 kV15 kVp.315 kVp.213.8 kVp.5
Short-circuit ratinghard gate · ≥ 25 kA25 kAp.331.5 kAp.225 kAp.5
Arc-resistance classhard gate · Type 2BType 2Bp.4not statedType 2Bp.6
Lead timeas quoted38 wk AROp.932 wk after drawing approvalp.844 wk AROp.11
Evaluated costUSD, freight and duties included1,284,5001,196,000incomparablefreight not quoted
1 critical deviation undecidedThe award waits for the engineer.

Fig. 3 Bid matrix: three quotes against three hard gates. Synthetic.

What we hold to.

Start with a 48-hour quote audit.

Send one live package, the spec and the quotes you already have. Within 48 hours you get back a normalized comparison with every exception flagged and every value linked to its page. Fixed scope, one package, nothing goes out to your suppliers.

Request the audit
You send
The spec (PDF), the quotes (PDF or email) and the site-required date, under a signed data agreement. Redacted is fine.
You get
The bid matrix for your package, the list of technical exceptions, and a before/after of what the quotes claimed versus what the spec requires.
What it costs
A fixed pilot fee agreed up front. No subscription, no per-seat licence, no commitment beyond the one package.